This makes Blue Yeti more versatile, allowing it to work in many different settings. However, Blue Yeti comes with a multi-pattern feature, allowing four different modes of operation.Īside from cardioid, we have omnidirectional, bidirectional, and stereo modes. When it comes to the pickup pattern, Rode NT USB has the classic cardioid pattern, which is normal for every vocal-oriented mic. Overall, the Rode mic is a bit “flatter” in response, but we’ll get to that later. Meanwhile, Blue Yeti has a small bump at around 1 kHz and another one between 2.5 to 7 kHz. Just looking at the graphical representation, we can notice that the Rode mic has a bump from 2 to 10 kHz, with a peak at around 5.5 kHz.
However, there are some differences when it comes to the frequency distribution. When it comes to the range of frequencies that they cover, Blue Yeti and Rode NT USB are pretty much the same, at least on paper. Main Specifications: Rode NT USB vs Blue Yeti Frequency Response This makes it an awesome choice if you also need something for both voice and instrument recordings.
Go for Blue Yeti if you need a mic with more character, more controls, and multiple polar patterns. It’s mostly focused just on the vocal works but can handle some instrument recordings as well.
Go for Rode NT USB if you prefer a simpler mic with a “flatter” frequency response. So when it comes down to Rode NT USB vs Blue Yeti, which one should you choose? Here’s a quick overview: Rode NT USB Blue Yeti 30-Second Summary: Rode NT USB vs Blue Yeti
0 kommentar(er)
